Battlestar Galactica
Science Lost In A
Neopolitical Era
Commentary
By Tim McGuinness, Ph.D.,
April
21, 2009Now
that the excellent remake of Battlestar Galactica is over,
there is time to reflect on what we saw, the stereotypes
displayed, and on the series ending.
What you may ask, does
this have to do with Archaeology? Actually several
things!
In the series, we are lead
to believe from the beginning that this is a "parallel"
civilization. This is critical so that we set aside
our natural skepticism and disbelief. There are so
many things that defy possibility in their similarity, but a
parallel allows for these.
Over the course of the penultimate and final
seasons, we learn of an Earth destroyed by nuclear war, that
was the "homeland" of the final five Cylons. We see
the cities laid waste. Yet planets are big things -
dynamic and self repairing. There were even survivable
areas on the 12 Colonies after their nuclear holocausts -
were it not for the Cylon invaders crawling all over them,
Colonial civilization could have rebuilt. But not on
the found Earth - within minutes Earth was written off.
What was odd about this part of the story was the total lack
of applied science in attempting to revert the "Earth" or
portions into habitation. Yet they abandoned it
without a thought.
Fast forward to the final
battle and Starbuck's delivery of Galactica to New New Earth
(our Earth?).
We see OUR familiar
homeworld, with Neolithic humans traveling across a plain,
spears at the ready. Somehow the Doc does a DNA test
without close contact (from what we see) and we are told
that the Galacticans and the local humans are compatible.
So 39,000, more or less, Galacticans and Cylons dump
themselves on the planet, melt their ships in the Sun (Sol),
and reject ALL technology, in the guise of a New Beginning.
They voice their desire to abandon the concept
of cities, yet their are practical realities for survival.
Even spread across the planet, several thousand humans
together leave quite a foot print. Plus they must be
fed and sheltered. After all, there were big nasty
critters that would eat human sized snacks - Sabertooth
Cats, Giant Birds, Huge Crocodiles, Dire Wolves, and more.
The practical necessities of survival demand small cities.
Additionally, this was too
early for the introduction of agriculture to our planet - by
at least 100,000 years. Should we believe that they
would not have brought a single Colonial plant or animal
with them? They had green houses in abundance - enough
to support a standing population of almost 40,000
Galacticans.
However, the single
biggest screw-up in the ending is the mythology. Their
culture was based upon what we know of as Greek Mythology.
Same names for god and goddesses. Yet, if Galactica
arrived 150,000 years in the past - the only way for that
mythology to survive to modern Greek civilization times,
would be through substantial written records AND an active
religion with arrived fully formed in the early formative
period of the Greek civilization. Yet we know that to
not be the case. Simply because we had fully formed,
fully complex, and totally unique mythologies develop long
before the Greeks. The Greek mythology was a home
grown invention borrowing bits and pieces from Babylon and
Egypt, and possibly more.
But ignoring these
considerations, we then jump forward to our (Earthy Humans')
present. Two "Angles" wander through New York City and
compare the past Colonies & Cylon civilization with the
present. Then we jump to a recent discovery. The
actual, factual, discovery of an ancestral Eve.
But consider: almost
40,000 (so called) modern humans landed on Earth 150,000
years ago - per the story line. These are
technological humans, and regardless of desires, they WOULD
have used their knowledge to sustain and improve their
lives. They would have developed villages. They
would have eventually bred with the locals. If Eve was
an ancestor, what about the others? What about the
hundreds of Cylons that came down? Admiral Adalma even
had a flying "Raptor" - now that would make an interesting
discovery buried in a midden mound.
The point is that the writers chose a cop-out.
So rarely are consequences thought out in films, so rarely
is the probable outcomes considered and presented, and we
have become so accepting of dumb ideas, that we rarely
challenge them. Logic is almost never considered.
The new Battlestar
Galactica was a wondrous television series. But they
owed their viewers a better ending. An ending that was
plausible, logical, and consistent with our ACTUAL history
since they were going to borrow it for their ending.
The irony is that it would have been easy to do this, but
they chose not to involve a Paleoanthropologist or an
Archaeologist in the final story development. All the
more sad because of it.
If we learn one thing from
this remake of Battlestar Galactica it is this: Strive
for the truth, and don't accept easy answers. Not from
our entertainment, not from our media, and not from the
politicians that work for us. And especially not from
a President who's only qualification is that he got elected.
We deserve better answers, better people, better science,
better history, and better stories.
We deserve the TRUTH!
Back » |